Home/Case Law/CLAUDIA NITO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES, INTERCARE
Regular DecisionPetition for Reconsideration

CLAUDIA NITO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES, INTERCARE

Filed: Feb 15, 2023
Anaheim
ADJ11780107

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's decision. The Board found the applicant's December 20, 2018 Amended Application for Adjudication of Claim was a valid filing against IHSS, even with its informalities. Furthermore, the Board agreed that the applicant's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The defendant's contention of an inaccurate service address on the amended application was dismissed as a new issue raised on reconsideration and factually disproven.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's decision. The Board found the applicant's December 20, 2018 Amended Application for Adjudication of Claim was a valid filing against IHSS, even with its informalities. Furthermore, the Board agreed that the applicant's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The defendant's contention of an inaccurate service address on the amended application was dismissed as a new issue raised on reconsideration and factually disproven.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CLAUDIA NITO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES, INTERCARE (2023) – Anaheim | CompFox