Home/Case Law/CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: May 01, 2017
Santa Rosa
ADJ7318122 ADJ9627723

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a denial of her workers' compensation claim for psychiatric injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, adopting the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) report. The applicant argued her claim was presumptively compensable under Labor Code section 5402, but the WCAB found this issue was waived because it was not raised at trial. The WCAB also gave great weight to the WCJ's credibility determinations.

CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Rosa. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Rosa.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a denial of her workers' compensation claim for psychiatric injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration, adopting the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) report. The applicant argued her claim was presumptively compensable under Labor Code section 5402, but the WCAB found this issue was waived because it was not raised at trial. The WCAB also gave great weight to the WCJ's credibility determinations.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Santa Rosa. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Santa Rosa. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

CINDY MACHADO vs. NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES, US FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRUM & FORSTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Rosa. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.