CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a Petition for Removal filed by the defendant, The Kroger Co. dba Ralphs, seeking to rescind an order continuing the applicant's case to trial. The defendant argued that inconsistencies in the agreed medical evaluator's reports required further discovery, such as interrogatories or a second deposition, before proceeding. The Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's reasoning that the adequacy of the medical record cannot be determined until the matter is submitted for trial. The Board emphasized that it is more expeditious to proceed to trial and allow the WCJ to assess the record's completeness then.
CINDY HEWITT vs. THE KROGER CO. dba RALPHS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a Petition for Removal filed by the defendant, The Kroger Co. dba Ralphs, seeking to rescind an order continuing the applicant's case to trial. The defendant argued that inconsistencies in the agreed medical evaluator's reports required further discovery, such as interrogatories or a second deposition, before proceeding. The Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's reasoning that the adequacy of the medical record cannot be determined until the matter is submitted for trial. The Board emphasized that it is more expeditious to proceed to trial and allow the WCJ to assess the record's completeness then.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.