Home/Case Law/CHRISTOPHER BLACKWELL vs. CARDINAL HEALTH; SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

CHRISTOPHER BLACKWELL vs. CARDINAL HEALTH; SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Mar 29, 2012
Van Nuys
ADJ7412202

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Defendant Cardinal Health's petition for removal, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's order allowing Applicant's attorney to depose the claims adjuster. The deposition is relevant to Applicant's claims for penalties and sanctions concerning alleged failures to pay temporary disability indemnity and for other delays in benefits. While the Board cautioned Applicant's counsel regarding extravagant rhetoric in his petitions, it found no sufficient prejudice to Defendant to warrant rescinding the deposition order. The Board determined the adjuster likely possesses information pertinent to the alleged misconduct supporting Applicant's claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Defendant Cardinal Health's petition for removal, affirming the Administrative Law Judge's order allowing Applicant's attorney to depose the claims adjuster. The deposition is relevant to Applicant's claims for penalties and sanctions concerning alleged failures to pay temporary disability indemnity and for other delays in benefits. While the Board cautioned Applicant's counsel regarding extravagant rhetoric in his petitions, it found no sufficient prejudice to Defendant to warrant rescinding the deposition order. The Board determined the adjuster likely possesses information pertinent to the alleged misconduct supporting Applicant's claims.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CHRISTOPHER BLACKWELL vs. CARDINAL HEALTH; SEDGWICK CMS (2012) – Van Nuys | CompFox