Home/Case Law/CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Oct 07, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3401894 (OAK 0348541)

CompFox AI Summary

The Arbitrator's decision is affirmed, with amendments reflecting that applicant sustained a cumulative injury from April 30, 2007, to October 18, 2007, and that his attorney is entitled to a 15% fee.

CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Arbitrator's decision is affirmed, with amendments reflecting that applicant sustained a cumulative injury from April 30, 2007, to October 18, 2007, and that his attorney is entitled to a 15% fee.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

CHRIS HYLAND vs. BROWARD BROTHERS INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.