CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the trial judge's finding that the applicant's condition was permanent and stationary as of July 10, 2017. This decision was based on the applicant's argument that the Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) report was not substantial evidence because it did not consider more recent reports from the applicant's treating physician. Subsequent treatment recommendations by the treating physician, including injections and potential surgery, indicated the applicant's condition may not be stable. The case is remanded for further proceedings to develop the record, specifically by having the QME review the updated medical reports.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the trial judge's finding that the applicant's condition was permanent and stationary as of July 10, 2017. This decision was based on the applicant's argument that the Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) report was not substantial evidence because it did not consider more recent reports from the applicant's treating physician. Subsequent treatment recommendations by the treating physician, including injections and potential surgery, indicated the applicant's condition may not be stable. The case is remanded for further proceedings to develop the record, specifically by having the QME review the updated medical reports.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.