Home/Case Law/CHRIS ARCE vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionReconsideration, Removal

CHRIS ARCE vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Apr 29, 2013
Anaheim
ADJ8150716

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order setting trial was interlocutory, not final. The WCAB granted removal of the order, finding applicant was denied due process by lack of notice for a status conference. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the order setting trial and substituted an order converting the trial date to a mandatory settlement conference. This decision aims to address potential prejudice to the applicant and promote judicial economy.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order setting trial was interlocutory, not final. The WCAB granted removal of the order, finding applicant was denied due process by lack of notice for a status conference. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the order setting trial and substituted an order converting the trial date to a mandatory settlement conference. This decision aims to address potential prejudice to the applicant and promote judicial economy.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CHRIS ARCE vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS (2013) – Anaheim | CompFox