Home/Case Law/CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES

Filed: May 09, 2008
San Francisco
SAC 0348804

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding that his hip replacement surgery, which involved the removal of the femoral head, did not qualify as an amputation under Labor Code section 4656(c)(2)(C). Consequently, the applicant is limited to 104 weeks of temporary disability benefits. The Board followed its prior en banc ruling in Cruz v. Mercedes-Benz, which defined amputation as the severance of external body parts and not the removal of internal, non-projecting structures.

CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding that his hip replacement surgery, which involved the removal of the femoral head, did not qualify as an amputation under Labor Code section 4656(c)(2)(C). Consequently, the applicant is limited to 104 weeks of temporary disability benefits. The Board followed its prior en banc ruling in Cruz v. Mercedes-Benz, which defined "amputation" as the severance of external body parts and not the removal of internal, non-projecting structures.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES Case Analysis

CHESTER WILLIAMSON vs. RADNOR HOLDINGS, dba WINCUP, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.