CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision finding that the defendant properly completed and communicated utilization review decisions, and that the applicant failed to prove the Independent Medical Review (IMR) process was biased. The Board held that delays in IMR decisions do not invalidate them, citing a relevant appellate court opinion. Furthermore, the Board lacks the authority to rule on the constitutionality of the relevant Labor Code sections. Therefore, the original decision was upheld.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision finding that the defendant properly completed and communicated utilization review decisions, and that the applicant failed to prove the Independent Medical Review (IMR) process was biased. The Board held that delays in IMR decisions do not invalidate them, citing a relevant appellate court opinion. Furthermore, the Board lacks the authority to rule on the constitutionality of the relevant Labor Code sections. Therefore, the original decision was upheld.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.