Home/Case Law/CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE

Filed: Sep 23, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1488656 (LBO 0306208) ADJ4306223 (LBO 0322527) ADJ4190554 (LBO 0365076) ADJ2421745 (LBO 0306207)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns applicant Charlie Wooten's claim for cumulative trauma injuries arising from her employment as a secretary. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to reverse the original finding that the date of injury was August 14, 1997. The Board determined, based on case law regarding disability, that the correct date of injury is November 6, 1998, the date applicant became temporarily totally disabled for surgery. This shifts liability to Zenith Insurance, as CIGA is excluded when other coverage exists for the cumulative trauma period. The Board also remanded the neck injury claim for further determination.

CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns applicant Charlie Wooten's claim for cumulative trauma injuries arising from her employment as a secretary. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to reverse the original finding that the date of injury was August 14, 1997. The Board determined, based on case law regarding "disability," that the correct date of injury is November 6, 1998, the date applicant became temporarily totally disabled for surgery. This shifts liability to Zenith Insurance, as CIGA is excluded when other coverage exists for the cumulative trauma period. The Board also remanded the neck injury claim for further determination.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE Case Analysis

CHARLIE WOOTEN vs. BARLOW RESPIRATORY HOSPITAL, ZENITH INSURANCE, CIGA, HIH AMERICA/GREAT STATES IN LIQUIDATION, Administered by INTERCARE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.