CompFox AI Summary
In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board rescinded an arbitrator's decision and ruled that the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are not entitled to contribution from the Oakland Raiders. The applicant, a professional football player, sustained a cumulative injury during his NFL career, with the key issue being the relevant Labor Code section 5500.5 one-year liability period. The Board determined that the applicant's last date of injurious exposure, including rehabilitation and training, extended to his termination by the Buccaneers on August 30, 2005, thus placing only Tampa Bay within the liability period. Consequently, the Buccaneers' petition for contribution from the Raiders was denied.
, CHARLIE GARNER, vs. , TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS; PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY; OAKLAND RAIDERS; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board rescinded an arbitrator's decision and ruled that the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are not entitled to contribution from the Oakland Raiders. The applicant, a professional football player, sustained a cumulative injury during his NFL career, with the key issue being the relevant Labor Code section 5500.5 one-year liability period. The Board determined that the applicant's last date of injurious exposure, including rehabilitation and training, extended to his termination by the Buccaneers on August 30, 2005, thus placing only Tampa Bay within the liability period. Consequently, the Buccaneers' petition for contribution from the Raiders was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.