CompFox AI Summary
Charlie E. Beckham was initially placed on deferred adjudication for aggravated assault in 2004, followed by two years of community supervision. In 2006, he was found guilty of violating his community supervision terms and sentenced to five years confinement, which was then suspended in favor of five years community supervision. In January 2009, the State initiated proceedings to revoke his community supervision due to multiple violations. Beckham admitted to most, but not all, of the alleged violations, leading the trial court to revoke his supervision and impose a five-year confinement sentence. Pending before the Court of Appeals, Beckham filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal, indicating his desire to withdraw his notice of appeal. The motion was granted by the Court of Appeals, and the appeal was subsequently dismissed.
Charlie E. Beckham v. State is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Charlie E. Beckham was initially placed on deferred adjudication for aggravated assault in 2004, followed by two years of community supervision. In 2006, he was found guilty of violating his community supervision terms and sentenced to five years confinement, which was then suspended in favor of five years community supervision. In January 2009, the State initiated proceedings to revoke his community supervision due to multiple violations. Beckham admitted to most, but not all, of the alleged violations, leading the trial court to revoke his supervision and impose a five-year confinement sentence. Pending before the Court of Appeals, Beckham filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal, indicating his desire to withdraw his notice of appeal. The motion was granted by the Court of Appeals, and the appeal was subsequently dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.