Home/Case Law/CHARLEY W. ELLISON, JR. vs. ALSCO, INC.; ACE AMERICAN
Regular Decision

CHARLEY W. ELLISON, JR. vs. ALSCO, INC.; ACE AMERICAN

Filed: Jan 13, 2009
San Francisco
MON 353741

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed against a procedural order denying a change of venue, not a final order resolving substantive rights. The Board clarified that reconsideration is only permissible for final decisions, awards, or orders that determine the ultimate rights and liabilities of the parties involved. As the order in question was interlocutory, it did not qualify for reconsideration.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed against a procedural order denying a change of venue, not a final order resolving substantive rights. The Board clarified that reconsideration is only permissible for final decisions, awards, or orders that determine the ultimate rights and liabilities of the parties involved. As the order in question was interlocutory, it did not qualify for reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CHARLEY W. ELLISON, JR. vs. ALSCO, INC.; ACE AMERICAN (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox