CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Wausau's petition for reconsideration to correct a coverage date error, finding Wausau's insurance coverage ended before the applicant's last year of injurious exposure. Consequently, Wausau was dismissed as a party defendant, and Lockheed Martin, self-insured and administered by Helmsman, was found solely liable for benefits. Helmsman's petition for reconsideration was denied due to its inadequacy and failure to comply with procedural rules. The original award of 83% permanent disability and need for future medical care was otherwise affirmed.
CHARLES THOMPSON vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN, Employers Mutual of Wausau Insurance Company is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Wausau's petition for reconsideration to correct a coverage date error, finding Wausau's insurance coverage ended before the applicant's last year of injurious exposure. Consequently, Wausau was dismissed as a party defendant, and Lockheed Martin, self-insured and administered by Helmsman, was found solely liable for benefits. Helmsman's petition for reconsideration was denied due to its inadequacy and failure to comply with procedural rules. The original award of 83% permanent disability and need for future medical care was otherwise affirmed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.