Home/Case Law/CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

Filed: Nov 19, 2019
Riverside
ADJ7781219

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves Charles Sinclair, a Licensed Vocational Nurse, who sustained an injury to his hands, wrists, and upper extremities on December 21, 2010, resulting in complex regional pain syndrome. The WCJ found Sinclair to be 100% permanently disabled based on the opinions of treating physicians Dr. Baker and Dr. Pelton, and vocational expert Enrique Vega, despite conflicting opinions from other medical examiners. The defendants petitioned for reconsideration, arguing a lack of substantial evidence and insufficient apportionment to prior injuries. The Board denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's findings and adopting the WCJ's report, which found the defendant failed to meet their burden of proof regarding apportionment.

CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves Charles Sinclair, a Licensed Vocational Nurse, who sustained an injury to his hands, wrists, and upper extremities on December 21, 2010, resulting in complex regional pain syndrome. The WCJ found Sinclair to be 100% permanently disabled based on the opinions of treating physicians Dr. Baker and Dr. Pelton, and vocational expert Enrique Vega, despite conflicting opinions from other medical examiners. The defendants petitioned for reconsideration, arguing a lack of substantial evidence and insufficient apportionment to prior injuries. The Board denied reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's findings and adopting the WCJ's report, which found the defendant failed to meet their burden of proof regarding apportionment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES workers compensation case in Riverside. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES case law summary from Riverside. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES Case Analysis

CHARLES SINCLAIR vs. RICHARD J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; Legally Uninsured; administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Riverside. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.