Home/Case Law/CHARLES PINEDA vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD, OCTAGON RISK SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CHARLES PINEDA vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD, OCTAGON RISK SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jul 30, 2007
San Francisco
RDG 0119112 RDG 0119113

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for reconsideration and removal filed by applicant Charles Pineda against his employer and their insurers. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding it was improperly filed against interlocutory orders that did not determine substantive rights. The Board also denied the petition for removal, agreeing with the WCJ's report that no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm was demonstrated.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for reconsideration and removal filed by applicant Charles Pineda against his employer and their insurers. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding it was improperly filed against interlocutory orders that did not determine substantive rights. The Board also denied the petition for removal, agreeing with the WCJ's report that no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm was demonstrated.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CHARLES PINEDA vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD, OCTAGON RISK SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox