Home/Case Law/CHARLES LOPEZ vs. BEST ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING, CNA CLAIMS
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

CHARLES LOPEZ vs. BEST ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING, CNA CLAIMS

Filed: Nov 03, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ194480 (VNO 0510012)

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant's petition for removal is denied because the WCJ did not abuse discretion in ordering development of the record, and reconsideration will be an adequate remedy for any remaining issues.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant's petition for removal is denied because the WCJ did not abuse discretion in ordering development of the record, and reconsideration will be an adequate remedy for any remaining issues.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CHARLES LOPEZ vs. BEST ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING, CNA CLAIMS (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox