Home/Case Law/CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Jun 27, 2008
Bakersfield
BAK 0131243

CompFox AI Summary

Lien claimants sought reconsideration of dismissal orders for their medical treatment liens. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed their petition because they failed to serve the petition on the applicant, a mandatory procedural requirement. Even if considered on the merits, the WCAB would have denied the petition, agreeing with the judge that the liens were properly dismissed for non-appearance at a lien trial.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Lien claimants sought reconsideration of dismissal orders for their medical treatment liens. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed their petition because they failed to serve the petition on the applicant, a mandatory procedural requirement. Even if considered on the merits, the WCAB would have denied the petition, agreeing with the judge that the liens were properly dismissed for non-appearance at a lien trial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2008) – Bakersfield | CompFox