Home/Case Law/CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Jun 27, 2008
Bakersfield
BAK 0131243

CompFox AI Summary

Lien claimants sought reconsideration of dismissal orders for their medical treatment liens. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed their petition because they failed to serve the petition on the applicant, a mandatory procedural requirement. Even if considered on the merits, the WCAB would have denied the petition, agreeing with the judge that the liens were properly dismissed for non-appearance at a lien trial.

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Lien claimants sought reconsideration of dismissal orders for their medical treatment liens. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed their petition because they failed to serve the petition on the applicant, a mandatory procedural requirement. Even if considered on the merits, the WCAB would have denied the petition, agreeing with the judge that the liens were properly dismissed for non-appearance at a lien trial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES workers compensation case in Bakersfield. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES case law summary from Bakersfield. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Case Analysis

CHARLES COLE vs. TIMEC CORPORTATION, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Bakersfield. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.