CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed a prior decision allowing deposition attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5710(b)(4). This was despite the applicant providing perjured testimony at depositions, as the Appeals Board found the applicant's overall claim of industrial injury was not fraudulent. The Board emphasized that the award of such fees is discretionary and they found no sufficient basis to overturn the judge's exercise of discretion.
CHARLENE SUMPTER vs. CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed a prior decision allowing deposition attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5710(b)(4). This was despite the applicant providing perjured testimony at depositions, as the Appeals Board found the applicant's overall claim of industrial injury was not fraudulent. The Board emphasized that the award of such fees is discretionary and they found no sufficient basis to overturn the judge's exercise of discretion.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.