CompFox AI Summary
Defendant sought reconsideration and removal of the WCJ's order deferring their petition to disqualify the IME, Dr. Rogers. The Board dismissed the reconsideration petition as interlocutory orders are not subject to review. Removal was denied as defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice or irreparable harm, having waived objections to Dr. Rogers' appointment and not proving bias in his reports. Therefore, the WCAB dismissed the petition for reconsideration and denied removal.
CEZAR MORALES vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Permissibly Self-Insured, INTERCARE INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant sought reconsideration and removal of the WCJ's order deferring their petition to disqualify the IME, Dr. Rogers. The Board dismissed the reconsideration petition as interlocutory orders are not subject to review. Removal was denied as defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice or irreparable harm, having waived objections to Dr. Rogers' appointment and not proving bias in his reports. Therefore, the WCAB dismissed the petition for reconsideration and denied removal.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.