CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Travelers' Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the arbitrator's decision. The arbitrator found that Travelers was responsible for 58% contribution to Clarendon for applicant Celia Ramos's cumulative trauma injury. Travelers argued the date of injury was incorrect, but the arbitrator correctly determined it based on the concurrence of disability and knowledge, which occurred when the applicant underwent wrist surgery. The Board adopted the arbitrator's reasoning, incorporating it into their order.
CELIA RAMOS vs. LEE'S MAINTENANCE SERVICE, INC., CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Travelers' Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the arbitrator's decision. The arbitrator found that Travelers was responsible for 58% contribution to Clarendon for applicant Celia Ramos's cumulative trauma injury. Travelers argued the date of injury was incorrect, but the arbitrator correctly determined it based on the concurrence of disability and knowledge, which occurred when the applicant underwent wrist surgery. The Board adopted the arbitrator's reasoning, incorporating it into their order.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.