Home/Case Law/Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Joseph Earl Cavender, the appellant, sued Houston Distributing Company, Inc. for wrongful termination, alleging a violation of section 451.001 of the Texas Labor Code. Cavender was terminated after missing more than 180 consecutive days of work due to a work-related injury and subsequent workers' compensation claim. The employer's policy was to discharge employees with over 180 consecutive days of absence. A jury found in favor of the employer, concluding that Cavender was not discharged because he filed a workers' compensation claim. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's take-nothing judgment, citing established Texas Supreme Court precedent that uniform enforcement of reasonable absence-control provisions does not constitute retaliatory discharge.

Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Joseph Earl Cavender, the appellant, sued Houston Distributing Company, Inc. for wrongful termination, alleging a violation of section 451.001 of the Texas Labor Code. Cavender was terminated after missing more than 180 consecutive days of work due to a work-related injury and subsequent workers' compensation claim. The employer's policy was to discharge employees with over 180 consecutive days of absence. A jury found in favor of the employer, concluding that Cavender was not discharged because he filed a workers' compensation claim. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's take-nothing judgment, citing established Texas Supreme Court precedent that uniform enforcement of reasonable absence-control provisions does not constitute retaliatory discharge.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. Case Analysis

Cavender v. HOUSTON DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.