Home/Case Law/CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency

Filed: May 25, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ4137704 (ANA 0343896) ADJ3434427 (ANA 0343894)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves denied reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order. The Board affirmed the finding that the applicant was entitled to Soma and Valium based on her physician's opinion. Additionally, the Board upheld the appointment of a Nurse Practitioner to coordinate the applicant's complex medication regimen and aid in cost reduction. Defendant's arguments regarding due process, utilization review, and the physician's opinion were rejected.

CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves denied reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board order. The Board affirmed the finding that the applicant was entitled to Soma and Valium based on her physician's opinion. Additionally, the Board upheld the appointment of a Nurse Practitioner to coordinate the applicant's complex medication regimen and aid in cost reduction. Defendant's arguments regarding due process, utilization review, and the physician's opinion were rejected.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency Case Analysis

CATHY HOLDEN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH-METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.