Home/Case Law/CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Aug 25, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ 1226686 (WCK 60788)

CompFox AI Summary

Reconsideration granted; affirmed WCJ's finding of 46% permanent disability; reversed WCJ's finding of unreasonable delay in medical treatment due to insufficient evidence.

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Reconsideration granted; affirmed WCJ's finding of 46% permanent disability; reversed WCJ's finding of unreasonable delay in medical treatment due to insufficient evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.