CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board corrected a clerical error in a prior decision, specifically changing a finding from Defendant did unreasonably delay or refuse medical treatment to Defendant did not unreasonably delay or refuse medical treatment. This correction was made after the defendant alerted the Board to the mistake, and the Board exercised its authority to correct clerical errors at any time. Consequently, the defendant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as moot.
CATHY BAKER vs. JAMES H. KHOE, D.D.S., ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board corrected a clerical error in a prior decision, specifically changing a finding from "Defendant did unreasonably delay or refuse medical treatment" to "Defendant did not unreasonably delay or refuse medical treatment." This correction was made after the defendant alerted the Board to the mistake, and the Board exercised its authority to correct clerical errors at any time. Consequently, the defendant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as moot.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.