Home/Case Law/CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Mar 22, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ3647950 (GRO 0031930) ADJ2074335 (GRO 0031931)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a denial of temporary disability benefits. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The WCAB found the prior decision lacked substantial evidence, particularly regarding the applicant's entitlement to temporary disability from November 17, 2007, to the present. The WCAB emphasized that the treating physician's reports from the period in question, even if retrospective, must be fully considered, and the record may need further development, potentially through a deposition of the treating physician.

CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a denial of temporary disability benefits. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior decision, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The WCAB found the prior decision lacked substantial evidence, particularly regarding the applicant's entitlement to temporary disability from November 17, 2007, to the present. The WCAB emphasized that the treating physician's reports from the period in question, even if retrospective, must be fully considered, and the record may need further development, potentially through a deposition of the treating physician.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Case Analysis

CATHERINE R. HOWE vs. LONGS DRUGS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.