CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an order regarding attorney fees. The applicant did not dispute the previously awarded attorney fee amount. The disputed $200 would have gone to the applicant's second attorney, not the applicant herself. Therefore, the Board upheld the WCJ's decision.
CATHERINE PECK vs. GIBBS, GIDEN, LOCHER, TURNER, TRAVELERS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an order regarding attorney fees. The applicant did not dispute the previously awarded attorney fee amount. The disputed $200 would have gone to the applicant's second attorney, not the applicant herself. Therefore, the Board upheld the WCJ's decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.