CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that the applicant's February 22, 2005 request for vocational rehabilitation was her initial request, made within one year of the February 1, 2005 permanent disability award. Therefore, the statute of limitations did not bar her claim, and she is entitled to vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance from February 22, 2005, not January 14, 2005. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision to deny the employer's appeal and ordered the employer to withhold 20% of the applicant's VRMA for attorney's fees.
CATHERINE HOLDREN vs. UNITED AIRLINES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that the applicant's February 22, 2005 request for vocational rehabilitation was her initial request, made within one year of the February 1, 2005 permanent disability award. Therefore, the statute of limitations did not bar her claim, and she is entitled to vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance from February 22, 2005, not January 14, 2005. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision to deny the employer's appeal and ordered the employer to withhold 20% of the applicant's VRMA for attorney's fees.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.