Home/Case Law/CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION

Filed: Jun 19, 2018
Santa Ana
ADJ9615369, ADJ9615370, ADJ10928806

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Defendant's petition for reconsideration of an order approving a $50,000 settlement for Applicant's workers' compensation claims. Defendant argued the order incorrectly failed to credit $5,913.87 in permanent disability advances paid to Applicant. However, the Compromise and Release agreement clearly indicated zero permanent disability advances and explicitly settled that issue. The Appeals Board found no evidence of mutual mistake and denied reconsideration, ruling that Defendant's failure to ensure the credit was included in the agreement constituted a unilateral mistake due to their own neglect.

CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Defendant's petition for reconsideration of an order approving a $50,000 settlement for Applicant's workers' compensation claims. Defendant argued the order incorrectly failed to credit $5,913.87 in permanent disability advances paid to Applicant. However, the Compromise and Release agreement clearly indicated zero permanent disability advances and explicitly settled that issue. The Appeals Board found no evidence of mutual mistake and denied reconsideration, ruling that Defendant's failure to ensure the credit was included in the agreement constituted a unilateral mistake due to their own neglect.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION workers compensation case in Santa Ana. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION case law summary from Santa Ana. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION Case Analysis

CATALINA REYES QUINTANILLA vs. TARZANA FIVE-FOUR CORNERS INVESTMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Ana. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.