CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration, affirming the dismissal of its lien claim. The administrative law judge found the lien was filed more than three years after the last date of service and that no lien filing fee was paid. The Board adopted the judge's reasoning, noting the lien claimant failed to meet its burden to show the statute of limitations was tolled. Therefore, the lien claim was properly dismissed.
CATALINA HERNANDEZ vs. VISION MAX, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY/SAFECO is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration, affirming the dismissal of its lien claim. The administrative law judge found the lien was filed more than three years after the last date of service and that no lien filing fee was paid. The Board adopted the judge's reasoning, noting the lien claimant failed to meet its burden to show the statute of limitations was tolled. Therefore, the lien claim was properly dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.