Home/Case Law/CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionDecision After Reconsideration

CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Oct 15, 2025
Los Angeles
ADJ2755694; ADJ453468; ADJ3409238

CompFox AI Summary

Applicant Cassandra Washington sought reconsideration of a January 25, 2021 Findings, Award & Order (F&A) from a Workers' Compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) concerning multiple industrial injury claims against the County of Los Angeles. Key contentions included the improper exclusion of Dr. Miller's pain management report and the need for further development of the record regarding psychiatric injury, industrially related hypertension, sleep dysfunction, and temporary total disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) agreed with the WCJ's subsequent Report, finding Dr. Miller's report admissible under Labor Code section 4060 for compensability disputes and that the record required further development for psychiatric injury due to insufficient medical evidence. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the F&A and returned the matter to the trial level for additional proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Applicant Cassandra Washington sought reconsideration of a January 25, 2021 Findings, Award & Order (F&A) from a Workers' Compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) concerning multiple industrial injury claims against the County of Los Angeles. Key contentions included the improper exclusion of Dr. Miller's pain management report and the need for further development of the record regarding psychiatric injury, industrially related hypertension, sleep dysfunction, and temporary total disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) agreed with the WCJ's subsequent Report, finding Dr. Miller's report admissible under Labor Code section 4060 for compensability disputes and that the record required further development for psychiatric injury due to insufficient medical evidence. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the F&A and returned the matter to the trial level for additional proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT workers compensation case in Los Angeles. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT case law summary from Los Angeles. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT Case Analysis

CASSANDRA WASHINGTON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Los Angeles. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.