CompFox AI Summary
In Casey Nicknig v. Safe Credit Union, the defendant sought reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration because their initial review indicated further study of factual and legal issues was necessary. This action ensures a complete understanding of the record for a just decision. All future filings must be submitted in writing to the Board's Commissioners in San Francisco, not to district offices or via e-filing.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Casey Nicknig v. Safe Credit Union, the defendant sought reconsideration of a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration because their initial review indicated further study of factual and legal issues was necessary. This action ensures a complete understanding of the record for a just decision. All future filings must be submitted in writing to the Board's Commissioners in San Francisco, not to district offices or via e-filing.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.