Home/Case Law/CAROLYN LANGLEY vs. 101 CASINO, MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

CAROLYN LANGLEY vs. 101 CASINO, MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jul 02, 2019
Santa Rosa
ADJ9787224, ADJ10307321

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior award of permanent and total disability for Carolyn Langley against 101 Casino. The Board found the PQME's opinion substantial evidence supporting a combined award for two distinct industrial injuries because the physician could not reasonably apportion permanent disability between them. This conclusion aligns with case law allowing combined awards in limited circumstances where apportionment is medically speculative. The Board also found the WCJ correctly applied apportionment for a prior specific injury to the current cumulative trauma award.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior award of permanent and total disability for Carolyn Langley against 101 Casino. The Board found the PQME's opinion substantial evidence supporting a combined award for two distinct industrial injuries because the physician could not reasonably apportion permanent disability between them. This conclusion aligns with case law allowing combined awards in limited circumstances where apportionment is medically speculative. The Board also found the WCJ correctly applied apportionment for a prior specific injury to the current cumulative trauma award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CAROLYN LANGLEY vs. 101 CASINO, MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT (2019) – Santa Rosa | CompFox