Home/Case Law/CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

Filed: Nov 09, 2018
Anaheim
ADJ10452831

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's findings. The WCJ had improperly stricken the QME's reports due to an ex parte communication from the applicant inquiring about her pain impairment rating. While ex parte communications with a QME are prohibited, the Board found that the applicant's communication was not insignificant and could not be categorized as such. However, the Board remanded the case to the trial level to determine if the defendant elected to terminate the evaluation within a reasonable time or engaged in conduct inconsistent with that election, as required by recent en banc precedent.

CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's findings. The WCJ had improperly stricken the QME's reports due to an ex parte communication from the applicant inquiring about her pain impairment rating. While ex parte communications with a QME are prohibited, the Board found that the applicant's communication was not insignificant and could not be categorized as such. However, the Board remanded the case to the trial level to determine if the defendant elected to terminate the evaluation within a reasonable time or engaged in conduct inconsistent with that election, as required by recent en banc precedent.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP Case Analysis

CAROLINE DOLLEMORE vs. WAYNE PERRY, INC.; STARR SURPLUS LINES, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.