Home/Case Law/CAROLINA HERNANDEZ vs. SUPER GROCERS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PATRIOT RISK/ULLICO
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CAROLINA HERNANDEZ vs. SUPER GROCERS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PATRIOT RISK/ULLICO

Filed: Sep 24, 2015
Long Beach
ADJ8266758

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's award to applicant Carolina Hernandez. Defendant CIGA contended the WCJ erred in finding an industrial injury, asserting applicant was the initial aggressor in an altercation and that the injury was not reported until after her termination notice. The Board determined that video evidence, Exhibit E, is crucial to resolving the initial aggressor issue and ordered defendant to provide it. Reconsideration was granted to review this evidence and ensure a just decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's award to applicant Carolina Hernandez. Defendant CIGA contended the WCJ erred in finding an industrial injury, asserting applicant was the initial aggressor in an altercation and that the injury was not reported until after her termination notice. The Board determined that video evidence, Exhibit E, is crucial to resolving the initial aggressor issue and ordered defendant to provide it. Reconsideration was granted to review this evidence and ensure a just decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CAROLINA HERNANDEZ vs. SUPER GROCERS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PATRIOT RISK/ULLICO (2015) – Long Beach | CompFox