Home/Case Law/Carlos Vigil v. State
Regular Panel Decision DecisionCriminal Appeal

Carlos Vigil v. State

Filed: Oct 20, 2010
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
07-10-0367-CR; 07-10-0368-CR

CompFox AI Summary

This appellate decision concerns two criminal appeals from Carlos Vigil. The appellate court noted that neither the clerk's record nor the reporter's records were filed, and appellant's counsel sought to withdraw, citing non-employment and appellant's affidavit of indigence. The court abated the appeals and remanded the causes to the trial court to determine if Vigil wished to prosecute the appeals, his indigence, and his entitlement to a free appellate record and appointed counsel. Additionally, the decision addresses issues related to Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. (LLC) and KK Glass in a separate but consolidated aspect of the case, concerning a death case (Jimmy Harrison). The court found legally and factually sufficient evidence for gross negligence against LLC but deemed the $500,000 compensatory damages for pain and mental anguish factually insufficient, suggesting a remittitur to $50,000. The summary judgment granted to KK Glass, denying LLC's claims for contribution and indemnity, was affirmed.

Carlos Vigil v. State is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This appellate decision concerns two criminal appeals from Carlos Vigil. The appellate court noted that neither the clerk's record nor the reporter's records were filed, and appellant's counsel sought to withdraw, citing non-employment and appellant's affidavit of indigence. The court abated the appeals and remanded the causes to the trial court to determine if Vigil wished to prosecute the appeals, his indigence, and his entitlement to a free appellate record and appointed counsel. Additionally, the decision addresses issues related to Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. (LLC) and KK Glass in a separate but consolidated aspect of the case, concerning a death case (Jimmy Harrison). The court found legally and factually sufficient evidence for gross negligence against LLC but deemed the $500,000 compensatory damages for pain and mental anguish factually insufficient, suggesting a remittitur to $50,000. The summary judgment granted to KK Glass, denying LLC's claims for contribution and indemnity, was affirmed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Carlos Vigil v. State workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Carlos Vigil v. State case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Carlos Vigil v. State Case Analysis

Carlos Vigil v. State is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.