CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of its prior order. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the applicant's testimony lacked credibility due to inconsistencies and omissions regarding prior shoulder injuries. The WCJ determined the applicant failed to meet their burden of proving the injury was industrial, citing a lack of credible medical evidence supporting the claim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of its prior order. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the applicant's testimony lacked credibility due to inconsistencies and omissions regarding prior shoulder injuries. The WCJ determined the applicant failed to meet their burden of proving the injury was industrial, citing a lack of credible medical evidence supporting the claim.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.