Home/Case Law/CARLOS MARTINEZ vs. SA RECYCLING CORPORATION, SEDGWICK
Regular Decision

CARLOS MARTINEZ vs. SA RECYCLING CORPORATION, SEDGWICK

Filed: Jun 03, 2015
Santa Ana
ADJ7669443 ADJ7739963

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not taken from a final order, but rather an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decision. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, which the Board adopted, articulated the reasoning for these dismissals and denials. Therefore, the applicant's attempt to appeal an interim ruling was unsuccessful on both procedural grounds.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not taken from a final order, but rather an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decision. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, which the Board adopted, articulated the reasoning for these dismissals and denials. Therefore, the applicant's attempt to appeal an interim ruling was unsuccessful on both procedural grounds.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CARLOS MARTINEZ vs. SA RECYCLING CORPORATION, SEDGWICK (2015) – Santa Ana | CompFox