CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, finding the applicant was employed by Millicent Reynolds. Removal was granted on the Board's own motion to correct the prior award. The original award incorrectly listed Millicent Reynolds/Mallcraft as the employer, and the Board clarified that only Millicent Reynolds was the employer. The decision affirmed the award of workers' compensation benefits against Majestic Insurance Company.
CARLOS LARA vs. MILLICENT REYNOLDS LIVING TRUST is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, finding the applicant was employed by Millicent Reynolds. Removal was granted on the Board's own motion to correct the prior award. The original award incorrectly listed "Millicent Reynolds/Mallcraft" as the employer, and the Board clarified that only Millicent Reynolds was the employer. The decision affirmed the award of workers' compensation benefits against Majestic Insurance Company.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.