CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision apportioning 30% of the applicant's permanent disability to a pre-existing, non-industrial condition. The applicant's injury aggravated this DISH syndrome, and the Board found the Agreed Medical Examiner's opinion supporting apportionment constituted substantial evidence. The Board also rejected the applicant's argument that the judge improperly relied on an unadmitted report, as the relevant information was summarized within an admitted medical report.
CARLOS CONTRERAS vs. NATURAL SELECTION FOODS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision apportioning 30% of the applicant's permanent disability to a pre-existing, non-industrial condition. The applicant's injury aggravated this DISH syndrome, and the Board found the Agreed Medical Examiner's opinion supporting apportionment constituted substantial evidence. The Board also rejected the applicant's argument that the judge improperly relied on an unadmitted report, as the relevant information was summarized within an admitted medical report.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.