Home/Case Law/Carlos Cardenas vs. Precision Plastering, FARA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Carlos Cardenas vs. Precision Plastering, FARA

Filed: Feb 13, 2008
San Francisco
ANA 389142

CompFox AI Summary

The lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed because it was filed prematurely and without a final order to appeal. The Board found that the "Notice of Intention to Dismiss Lien" was an interlocutory procedural notice, not a final order determining substantive rights or liabilities. Since no decision or award had been issued regarding the lien claim, the petition for reconsideration was not properly before the Board.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed because it was filed prematurely and without a final order to appeal. The Board found that the "Notice of Intention to Dismiss Lien" was an interlocutory procedural notice, not a final order determining substantive rights or liabilities. Since no decision or award had been issued regarding the lien claim, the petition for reconsideration was not properly before the Board.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Carlos Cardenas vs. Precision Plastering, FARA (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox