CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision that found 0% permanent disability for an industrial injury to the applicant's right elbow and shoulder. The Board found that the Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) report was not substantial medical evidence as it failed to adequately explain the methodology used to arrive at the permanent disability rating within the AMA Guides. Consequently, the Board rescinded the original award and returned the case to the trial level for further development of the medical record.
CARL KILLEBREW, JR. vs. JAMES SHIRLEY CONSTRUCTION, APPLIED RISK is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior decision that found 0% permanent disability for an industrial injury to the applicant's right elbow and shoulder. The Board found that the Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) report was not substantial medical evidence as it failed to adequately explain the methodology used to arrive at the permanent disability rating within the AMA Guides. Consequently, the Board rescinded the original award and returned the case to the trial level for further development of the medical record.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.