CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that an applicant injured her back during a paid meal break while selling burritos on employer premises. The Board found this activity was within the course of employment under the personal comfort doctrine, distinguishing it from off-duty recreational activities. Defendant's due process and temporary disability contentions were rejected, as the employer remains liable for all temporary disability caused in part by an industrial injury, regardless of non-industrial conditions. Therefore, the original award of temporary disability benefits was affirmed.
CANDICE ANDERSON vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Fresno. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Fresno.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the finding that an applicant injured her back during a paid meal break while selling burritos on employer premises. The Board found this activity was within the course of employment under the "personal comfort" doctrine, distinguishing it from off-duty recreational activities. Defendant's due process and temporary disability contentions were rejected, as the employer remains liable for all temporary disability caused in part by an industrial injury, regardless of non-industrial conditions. Therefore, the original award of temporary disability benefits was affirmed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.