Home/Case Law/Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAmended Memorandum Opinion and Order

Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc.

Filed: Mar 29, 2002
District Court, E.D. Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This amended opinion addresses motions for partial summary judgment filed by Defendant Crown Central Petroleum, Inc., against a group of plaintiffs whose claims remained after class certification was denied. The court dismissed all hostile work environment claims for plaintiffs Karen Sloan, Phyllis Miller, John Grant, John McDowell, and Susan Robertson, primarily due to statute of limitations or insufficient evidence of actionable harassment within the limitations period. Catherine McAfee's failure to promote claim was also dismissed due to being time-barred. John Grant and John McDowell's failure to promote claims were dismissed for lack of prima facie evidence or failure to show pretext. Susan Robertson's failure to promote claims were dismissed due to lack of qualifications and being time-barred. However, the court denied summary judgment on Linda K. Brown's salary grade claim, finding a genuine issue of material fact regarding Crown's non-discriminatory reasons for salary variations between superintendents.

Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This amended opinion addresses motions for partial summary judgment filed by Defendant Crown Central Petroleum, Inc., against a group of plaintiffs whose claims remained after class certification was denied. The court dismissed all hostile work environment claims for plaintiffs Karen Sloan, Phyllis Miller, John Grant, John McDowell, and Susan Robertson, primarily due to statute of limitations or insufficient evidence of actionable harassment within the limitations period. Catherine McAfee's failure to promote claim was also dismissed due to being time-barred. John Grant and John McDowell's failure to promote claims were dismissed for lack of prima facie evidence or failure to show pretext. Susan Robertson's failure to promote claims were dismissed due to lack of qualifications and being time-barred. However, the court denied summary judgment on Linda K. Brown's salary grade claim, finding a genuine issue of material fact regarding Crown's non-discriminatory reasons for salary variations between superintendents.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc. workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc. case law summary from District Court, E.D. Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc. Case Analysis

Burrell v. Crown Central Petroleum, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.