CompFox AI Summary
The defendant sought removal to depose two of the applicant's treating physicians, arguing their testimony was necessary to develop the record following the deposition of another treating physician. The Appeals Board granted the petition, amending the WCJ's order to allow these depositions. This decision acknowledges the seriousness of the applicant's claim and the need for a complete record, especially given prior discovery disputes. The matter was returned for trial, with a timeframe set for the depositions.
BRUCE OBERG vs. ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC., GALLAGHER BASSETT, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The defendant sought removal to depose two of the applicant's treating physicians, arguing their testimony was necessary to develop the record following the deposition of another treating physician. The Appeals Board granted the petition, amending the WCJ's order to allow these depositions. This decision acknowledges the seriousness of the applicant's claim and the need for a complete record, especially given prior discovery disputes. The matter was returned for trial, with a timeframe set for the depositions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.