Home/Case Law/BRUCE OBERG vs. ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC., GALLAGHER BASSETT, INC.
Regular DecisionRemoval

BRUCE OBERG vs. ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC., GALLAGHER BASSETT, INC.

Filed: Jun 14, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ6652445

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant sought removal to depose two of the applicant's treating physicians, arguing their testimony was necessary to develop the record following the deposition of another treating physician. The Appeals Board granted the petition, amending the WCJ's order to allow these depositions. This decision acknowledges the seriousness of the applicant's claim and the need for a complete record, especially given prior discovery disputes. The matter was returned for trial, with a timeframe set for the depositions.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant sought removal to depose two of the applicant's treating physicians, arguing their testimony was necessary to develop the record following the deposition of another treating physician. The Appeals Board granted the petition, amending the WCJ's order to allow these depositions. This decision acknowledges the seriousness of the applicant's claim and the need for a complete record, especially given prior discovery disputes. The matter was returned for trial, with a timeframe set for the depositions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BRUCE OBERG vs. ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC., GALLAGHER BASSETT, INC. (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox