Home/Case Law/BRIDGETT LE BOY vs. KAISER PERMANENTE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BRIDGETT LE BOY vs. KAISER PERMANENTE

Filed: Dec 31, 2018
Stockton
ADJ11148584, ADJ11607816

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant sought reconsideration of an Order Approving Compromise and Release (OACR) for $$28,000.00$ related to back and lower extremity injuries. She argued she would not have settled if she had known her functional capacity test, crucial for her return to work, was approved on the same day as the settlement. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration due to the applicant's allegations and the Board's broad discretion. The OACR was rescinded, and the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine if the stipulations should be set aside.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant sought reconsideration of an Order Approving Compromise and Release (OACR) for $$28,000.00$ related to back and lower extremity injuries. She argued she would not have settled if she had known her functional capacity test, crucial for her return to work, was approved on the same day as the settlement. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration due to the applicant's allegations and the Board's broad discretion. The OACR was rescinded, and the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine if the stipulations should be set aside.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.