CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the order under review was a discovery ruling, not a final order. Furthermore, the Board denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding it lacked specific legal support and failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board noted that the admissibility of the subrosa video can be addressed at later evidentiary hearings. Additionally, the applicant's non-attorney representative's status and eligibility for fees remain unclear under current regulations.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the order under review was a discovery ruling, not a final order. Furthermore, the Board denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding it lacked specific legal support and failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board noted that the admissibility of the subrosa video can be addressed at later evidentiary hearings. Additionally, the applicant's non-attorney representative's status and eligibility for fees remain unclear under current regulations.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.