Home/Case Law/BRENDA TYNER vs. IHSS and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, KELLEE J. HOPKINS dba ACUTELY RESIDENTIAL CARE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BRENDA TYNER vs. IHSS and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, KELLEE J. HOPKINS dba ACUTELY RESIDENTIAL CARE

Filed: Jun 19, 2008
San Francisco
RDG 115445

CompFox AI Summary

The State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) sought reconsideration of an order approving a stipulation where an uninsured employer assumed 75% of liability. SCIF argued the stipulation lacked consideration as the uninsured employer had no intent to perform. However, SCIF subsequently withdrew its petition for reconsideration during a hearing, leading the Appeals Board to dismiss the petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) sought reconsideration of an order approving a stipulation where an uninsured employer assumed 75% of liability. SCIF argued the stipulation lacked consideration as the uninsured employer had no intent to perform. However, SCIF subsequently withdrew its petition for reconsideration during a hearing, leading the Appeals Board to dismiss the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BRENDA TYNER vs. IHSS and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, KELLEE J. HOPKINS dba ACUTELY RESIDENTIAL CARE (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox