CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Brad Mason's petition for reconsideration because it was not taken from a "final" order, but rather an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decision. The Board also denied his petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would justify this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's reasoning, adopted by the Board, was sufficient to deny both requests. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed and denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Brad Mason's petition for reconsideration because it was not taken from a "final" order, but rather an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decision. The Board also denied his petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would justify this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's reasoning, adopted by the Board, was sufficient to deny both requests. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed and denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.