Home/Case Law/BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jan 19, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ2560441 (STK 0197806) ADJ4237532 (STK 0125743)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves two cumulative injury claims for shoulder injuries sustained by the applicant waitress. Fremont Insurance Company, initially the insurer, became insolvent, and CIGA subsequently took over its obligations. CIGA sought reimbursement from SCIF, the subsequent insurer, for medical treatment provided to the applicant. The WCJ initially denied CIGA full reimbursement, finding the issue of 100% reimbursement for non-permanent disability benefits was not properly raised at trial. However, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding CIGA sufficiently raised the issue of full reimbursement in its petitions and supporting documents, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves two cumulative injury claims for shoulder injuries sustained by the applicant waitress. Fremont Insurance Company, initially the insurer, became insolvent, and CIGA subsequently took over its obligations. CIGA sought reimbursement from SCIF, the subsequent insurer, for medical treatment provided to the applicant. The WCJ initially denied CIGA full reimbursement, finding the issue of 100% reimbursement for non-permanent disability benefits was not properly raised at trial. However, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding CIGA sufficiently raised the issue of full reimbursement in its petitions and supporting documents, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

BONNIE GRAVES (FREITAS) vs. ALMOND TREE RESTAURANT, CALIFORNIA GUARANTEE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, For FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.